Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Smith, Glenn v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv20328
Plaintiff:
Glenn C. Smith
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Alex Knight
Defendant:
C. C. Smith and J. J. Fraddosio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Burgos et al
as 5:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Kquano C. Smith
Defendant:
A. Burgos, R. Maleske and Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Smith
as 1:2022cv04240
Petitioner:
John A. Hunter
Respondent:
Warden C. Smith and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C SMITH
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01042
Petitioner:
Derek Smith and Derek C. Smith
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
DEREK SMITH and DEREK C SMITH
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson et al v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Rodrick L. Richardson, Charles Low, Walter Christian and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Superior Courts, Georgia Public Defender Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C SMITH
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Inch
as 8:2021cv00644
Plaintiff:
William C. Smith, Chancery, Appointed Trustee, William C. Smith, Grantor, Settler, John and others
Defendant:
Mark Inch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
