Cases 1 - 10 of 6,208
Jones v. Dixon
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Derick Levell Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, FDC Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniels v. Thompson et al
as 3:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome McDaniels
Defendant:
Seth Thompson, D. Duckwilder, Cenrioun Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez Cruz v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv22130
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Sherea Green, M. Williams, Pondon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Weston et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R. Cleveland
Defendant:
Kathryn D. Weston and Amie M. Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Washington
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Derrick Florence
Defendant:
D. Washinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Mas-Govt., MD Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Cruz v. Green et al
as 6:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Sherea Green, M. Williams, Pondon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelvin Frazier v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 24-11705
Plaintiff:
KELVIN FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICKY D. DIXON, J. ROBINSON, J. HOLTZ and others
Grebenor v. Dixon
as 2:2024cv00515
Petitioner:
Kyle Joseph Grebenor
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
