Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
David Thomas v. Kenneth Jones, et al
as 17-11109
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID MATTHEW THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee: KENNETH JONES and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Miller v. State of Florida
as 6:2016cv01372
Petitioner: David Matthew Miller
Respondent: State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00431
Petitioner: David Matthew Thomas
Respondent: Kenneth Jones and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2009cv01614
Plaintiff: David Matthews
Defendant: State of Georgia, Donna Matthews and Daimontae S. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Warden
as 1:2009cv01223
Petitioner: David Matthews
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2009cv01110
Plaintiff: David Matthews
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2009cv01104
Plaintiff: David Matthews
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2009cv00963
Petitioner: David Matthews
Respondent: Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2008cv00597
Plaintiff: David Matthews
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Coffee County Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00978
Plaintiff: David Matthew Griffin
Defendant: Coffee County Commission, Benjamin Moates and Jack Innis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?