Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Michael Miller v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11514
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
MICHEAL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Roy Devon Hill
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Pat Labat, Lenwood Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 7:2023cv00134
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBERTS v. WEBB et al
as 3:2023cv24696
Plaintiff:
JAVONEY DEVON ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAMES R WEBB, C SIMMONS and T ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lane v. Ivey et al
as 6:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Devon L. Lane
Defendant:
Sheriff Wayne Ivey, Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRIE v. MCKINNEY et al
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
DEVON CURRIE
Defendant:
MCKINNEY and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Ivey et al
as 6:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Devon L. Lane
Defendant:
Sheriff Wayne Ivey, Officer Eliezer Nazario Guevara, Notary Jessica Michaud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
