Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LEE v. DIXON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv24526
Petitioner: FRED DOUGLAS LEE, JR
Respondent: RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. OWENS
as 1:2018cv00208
Plaintiff: REGINALD SCOTT
Defendant: Investigator DOUGLAS LEE OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv08046
Petitioner: Douglas Lee McDaniel
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Edwards v. Spell
as 8:2015cv01377
Plaintiff: Derek Maurice Edwards
Defendant: Douglas Lee Spell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Parris v. Charles Weaver
as 14-11223
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOUGLAS LEE PARRIS
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES WEAVER, individually and in his official capacity
PARRIS v. TAFT et al
as 4:2014cv00052
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS LEE PARRIS
Defendant: HILLARY TAFT, SAM HUNTER, VAUGHN MAXWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Parris v. John Darr, et al
as 13-12884
Petitioner - Appellant: DOUGLAS LEE PARRIS
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN DARR, Sheriff and DANE COLLINS, Commander
PARRIS v. Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit et al
as 4:2013cv00138
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS LEE PARRIS
Defendant: Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit, LETITIA SIKES and COLUMBUS GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARRIS v. Darr et al
as 4:2013cv00139
Petitioner: DOUGLAS LEE PARRIS
Respondent: John Darr and Dane Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PARRIS v. Weaver et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00330
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS LEE PARRIS
Defendant: Charles Weaver , LETITIA SIKES, Julia Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?