Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Walker v. McDough
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Walker
Defendant:
Chris McDough and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradham v. Palm Beach County Main Detention Center et al
as 9:2022cv81658
Plaintiff:
Marcus Irwin Bradham and Marcus Irwin Bradham II
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Main Detention Center, K. Williams, M. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Thompkins et al
as 4:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
Charles E Walker
Defendant:
Steve Thompkins, B Robinson, Lt. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Walker v. Joseph Miner, et al
as 18-12194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY E. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH MINER, JOHN DOE, Classification Officer, SHERIFF, Pinellas County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Lorenzo Walker v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 17-11814
Petitioner - Appellant:
LORENZO E. WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
WALKER v. INMATE MAGAZINE SERVICE INC
as 3:2016cv00610
Plaintiff:
MAURICE E WALKER
Defendant:
INMATE MAGAZINE SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elijah Jackson, Jr. v. Mark Walker, et al
as 16-10660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH JACKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK E. WALKER, US DISTRICT JUDGE INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY and CHARLES A. STAMPELOS, US MAGISTRATE JUDGE INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY
Walker v. Miner et al
as 8:2016cv00284
Petitioner:
ANTHONY E WALKER
Respondent:
JOSEPH MINER and Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2015cv00234
Petitioner:
LORENZO E WALKER
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stokes v. Migliosi et al
as 5:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Roderick Stokes
Defendant:
B. Migliosi, E. Walker, T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
