Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Casey v. Terry et al
as 3:2024cv01260
Defendant:
NAPH Care, David Terry, Thomas Freese and others
Plaintiff:
Quintus Bernard Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manchester, Jonathan v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00379
Respondent:
George Jr Harrigan, Craig Maguire, Amanda Lane and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Manchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manchester, Jonathan v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00764
Defendant:
Jamie K Davis, Robert Ant Delitta, Samantha L. English and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Manchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manchester, Jonathan v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv22782
Defendant:
Jennifer J. Ferraro, Lacie N. Mcanally, George Jr Harrigan and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Manchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
English v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00490
Petitioner:
Serdarryel Dave English, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02335
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
FREDERICK v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2024cv00240
Defendant:
G ENGLISH, R HOWELL and L MURPHY
Plaintiff:
QUINTON FREDERICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
G ENGLISH and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS, G ENGLISH, T DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENGLISH v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
CORDARREL ENGLISH
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
