Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Prince Jones v. K. Myers, et al
as 24-12414
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
B. WALLER, T. CORBIN, K. MYERS and others
Prince Jones v. K. Myers, et al
as 24-12415
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
J. HOBBS, Individual and Official Capacityunder color of their official and personal right, T. HAMMERLE, Individual and Official Capacityunder color of their official and personal right, K. GROOMS, Individual and Official Capacityunder color of their official and personal right and others
Wagner v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2021cv00281
Defendant:
Jon P. Carner, Emily Salema, Helen Sams and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillette v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2020cv02401
Defendant:
Kenneth Mapp, Steve Groom, Bureau of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gillette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groom v. Unknown Defendant
as 2:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Plaintiff:
Austin Groom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Myers et al
as 5:2019cv00655
Defendant:
Zachary Winter, T Corlsen, T Hammerle and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grooms v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2019cv02598
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Dustin Grooms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Myers et al
as 5:2019cv00318
Defendant:
Zachary Winter, T Corlsen, T Hammerle and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 4:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G WHITE
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC HOLDER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Taylor et al
as 1:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Charlie Henry Castillo
Defendant:
Leighton Taylor, Cynthia Derricott, Tony Grooms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
