Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Hatcher v. Griffin et al
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Griffin, Ballew, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maximo Gomez v. Danielle Key, et al
as 24-11007
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISTOPHER HELMS and J. HATCHER
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE KEY KEY, CHRISTOPHER HELMS and J HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maximo Gomez v. Danielle Key, et al
as 24-10786
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISTOPHER HELMS and J. HATCHER
Hatcher v. Eckhart et al
as 3:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Respondent:
Michael Eckhart, Peter Zenuti and Duval County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. Eckhart et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Michael Eckhart and Peter Zenuti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Florida Civil Commitment Center et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S Hatcher
Defendant:
Florida Civil Commitment Center, Jon Carner, Robert Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISOTPHER HELMS, J HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. Cardenas et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Daniel William Cardenas, Mark R. Ambrose, Jr. and Lisa Haskins Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
