Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rodricus Scott v. Jared Akins, et al
as 22-12499
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODRICUS D. SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee: JARED AKINS, Statesboro Police Department, individual and official capacities, TYSHEA CHARDAE LEE, Grand Juror, FRANCES JEANETTE MONTERO, Grand Juror and others
Scott v. Superior Court of Bulloch County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff: Rodricus D. Scott
Defendant: Superior Court of Bulloch County, Bulloch County Sheriff Office/Bulloch County Jail, Judge June Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hranek, et al v. State of Florida Office of the State Attorney et al
as 3:2021cv01136
Plaintiff: Christopher J. Hranek and E. H. Consolidated
Defendant: State of Florida Office of the State Attorney, Melissa Nelson, Terrence Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickson v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2020cv00500
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman
Petitioner: Daryl L. Hickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hickson v. Age et al
as 4:2018cv10035
Plaintiff: Jerome J. Hickson
Defendant: Age, Carne and Larry Carry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickson v. United States Of America
as 9:2016cv81203
Plaintiff: Daryl L Hickson
Defendant: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HICKSON v. USA
as 4:2016cv00190
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: LORENZO HICKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hickson v. Barrow
as 1:2012cv03122
Petitioner: Kelly Hickson
Respondent: Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daryl Hickson v. USA
as 12-11254
Petitioner - Appellant: DARYL L. HICKSON
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hickson v. United States of America
as 9:2010cv81556
Plaintiff: Daryl L. Hickson
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?