Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Robertson v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Scott Kilgore, J.M. Ebert, J.M. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Det. Scott Kilgore, Sheriff Lenn Wood, Officer Hunter Rollings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dipre v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2022cv22507
Plaintiff:
Pablo Dipre
Defendant:
State of Florida, Department of Corrections, K. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Brooks et al
as 3:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Radford S Brooks, J.D. Brooks, T.R. Yeagar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. U.S.A et al
as 5:2021cv00250
Defendant:
FNU Antolli, J.M. Henger, R.C. Cheatham and others
Plaintiff:
David S.L. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Mike Williams, et al
as 3:2021cv00392
Defendant:
C.T. Cowan, Detective Dowling, J.E. Busque and others
Plaintiff:
Sanford Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2021cv00179
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Parrish, Polk and others
Plaintiff:
Dytrell Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faircloth v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2020cv00430
Respondent:
J.M. Henger and Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Petitioner:
Michael Terrill Faircloth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Faircloth v. Henger
as 2:2020cv00689
Respondent:
J.M. Henger
Petitioner:
Michael Terrill Faircloth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jacobs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00231
Defendant:
C Rijos, J.M. Henger, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
David Aaron Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
