Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMES HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv01698
Petitioner:
Thomas James Harris
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harris v. State of Florida et al
as 5:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Alex Azar, Health and Human Services, W. Stephen Muldrow and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Fannin
as 1:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
Edward James Harris
Defendant:
Jeb Fannin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Elmore County District Attorney et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Willie James Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Elmore County District Attorney, Elmore County District Court, Elmore County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, V. Langford, FNU Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Hicks et al
as 8:2011mc00133
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Harris
Defendant:
Monda Hicks, Jumar Hicks, Nicole LNU and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Harris v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2008cv01981
Petitioner:
James Harris, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. United States of America
as 7:2008cv08047
Petitioner:
Amos James Harris, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
