Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 1:2024cv20375
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
Milord v. Tamash et al
as 6:2023cv01889
Plaintiff:
Yves Jean Jacques Milord
Defendant:
Darryl Tamash and Kevin Oaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennington v. Centurion Health Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv14206
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Pennington
Defendant:
Centurion Health Inc., Haridas Bhadja, Larkin Community Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
MILORD v. TAMASH et al
as 4:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
MILORD YVES JEAN JAQUES and YVES JEAN JACQUES MILORD
Defendant:
DARRYL TAMASH and KEVIN OASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatman v. Porter et al
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman and Lavon Lee Boatman
Defendant:
Elizabeth Porter, Jon P. Carner, Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullis, Jr. v. Clark et al
as 8:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
William Tony Mullis, Jr.
Defendant:
Clark, Carron, Klinect and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWENS v. GREENE et al
as 3:2022cv03003
Petitioner:
JOSHUA JACQUES BOWENS
Defendant:
WALKER CLEMMONS, GREENE, OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowens v. Clemmons et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jacques Bowens
Defendant:
Walker Clemmons, Greene, Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEAN JACQUES v. DAMPSEY et al
as 4:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
FRITTO JEAN JACQUES
Defendant:
ANGELA DAMPSEY, ROBERT HALE, KATHLEEN STONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
