Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Wingfield v. Warden, FCC Coleman-1
as 5:2023cv00562
Petitioner:
James H Wingfield and James H. Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Avila v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2021cv01449
Plaintiff:
Mario Avila
Defendant:
State of Alabama, James H. Anderson and Alabama Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scholtz v. Corizon Health et al
as 2:2020cv00362
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Corizon Health, Sergeant Dorothy Coates and others
Plaintiff:
James H. Scholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BISHOP v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 4:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
JAMES H BISHOP and JAMES HAROLD BISHOP, JR
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spreitzer v. Tony et al
as 0:2019cv62920
Plaintiff:
James H Spreitzer
Defendant:
Sheriff Gregory Tony, Ms. Arencibia and Ms. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawes v. Bryson et al
as 6:2018cv00131
Petitioner:
James H. Hawes
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Homer Bryson and Terry E. Barnard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Griffin v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 18-13193
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES H. GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Moss v. Tuscaloosa County et al
as 7:2018cv00953
Plaintiff:
Ambrienne Barsai Moss
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County and James H Roberts
Mediator:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yankaway v. Cooper et al
as 3:2018cv00578
Petitioner:
Johnny Bernard Yankaway
Respondent:
Joel Cooper, James H. Daniel, Pamela Jo Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
