Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Avila v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2021cv01449
Plaintiff:
Mario Avila
Defendant:
State of Alabama, James H. Anderson and Alabama Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Tuscaloosa County et al
as 7:2018cv00953
Plaintiff:
Ambrienne Barsai Moss
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County and James H Roberts
Mediator:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manson v. Roberts et al
as 7:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Marlon A. Manson
Defendant:
James H Roberts, Logan Flowers, Eric Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland v. Roberts et al
as 7:2015cv00846
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R Cleveland
Defendant:
James H Roberts, Jr and Stuart D Albea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Roberts et al
as 7:2015cv00667
Plaintiff:
Terry Terrell Johnson
Defendant:
James H Roberts, Jr, Logan Flowers and Daniel Pruet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dial v. Pulliam et al
as 4:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Winston Dial
Defendant:
Teresa Tanner Pulliam and James H. Hard, IV
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory v. Robinson et al
as 2:2008cv02307
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Ivory, .
Defendant:
Harold D Robinson, Fred S Gasbarro, Robert P Barclift and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gay v. McGhee et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv01012
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant:
Windom McGhee, Levan Thomas, James H. Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan v. Monk et al
as 2:2007cv01181
Plaintiff:
James H Callahan
Defendant:
Samuel H Monk, Robert Fields and Joseph Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Deloach et al
as 2:2007cv00266
Petitioner:
Johnathan C. Witherspoon
Respondent:
James H. Deloach and State of Alabama Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
