Cases 1 - 10 of 1,086
Spivack, Jeffrey v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv80748
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Spivack
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HILL v. NEWBERN et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY T HILL
Defendant:
E NEWBERN, KIGHT, VAN HOUTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pharr v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv02144
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey George Pharr
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Elroy Joshua Adams
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Cahill, Christopher A McLaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rolle, Stephen v. Fabien et al
as 1:2024cv21869
Plaintiff:
Stephen Rolle
Defendant:
Jeffrey Fabien, J. Schaefer, Xavier Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lagrandeur v. Witt et al
as 2:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lagrandeur
Defendant:
Witt, J. Steider, Z and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lagrandeur v. Grant et al
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lagrandeur
Defendant:
Lieutenant Grant, Officer Romerro and Lieutenent Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MICHEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
