Cases 1 - 10 of 32
HERRING v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK ROSHUN HERRING
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, JOHN MARKS, TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynes v. Department of Corrections
as 0:2017cv61994
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
John Mark Bynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Waseem Daker v. John Dawes, et al
as 14-13054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARK DAWES, BRADLEY LOUIS MCENTYRE, MARK ANTHONY BISHOP and others
Waseem Daker v. John Dawes, et al
as 14-13046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARK DAWES, Detective, BRADLEY LOUIS MCENTYRE, Detective, GEORGE B. HATFIELD, Chief, Cobb County Police Department and others
Waseem Daker v. John Dawes, et al
as 14-10780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARK DAWES, Detective, BRADLEY LOUIS MCENTYRE, Detective, GEORGE B. HATFIELD, Chief, Cobb County Police Department and others
Waseem Daker v. John Dawes, et al
as 13-14878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARK DAWES, Detective, BRADLEY LOUIS MCENTYRE, Detective, GEORGE B. HATFIELD, Chief, Cobb County Police Department and others
Hamby v. Grace et al
as 6:2013cv00846
Plaintiff:
Bobby J Hamby
Defendant:
Alfred Grace, John Mark Tirey, Henry Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill v. Tirey et al
as 6:2012cv03606
Petitioner:
Joe Paul Dill, Jr
Respondent:
John Mark Tirey and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daker v. Dawes et al
as 1:2012cv02782
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
John Mark Dawes, Bradley Louis McEntyre, Mark Anthony Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahon v. Tyree
as 6:2012cv02496
Petitioner:
Michael Patrick Mahon
Respondent:
John Mark Tyree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
