Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Daniels v. Linder et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Daniels
Defendant:
D. Linder, John Robert Houston and E. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos, John Robert v. Trump
as 9:2024cv80169
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
USA and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KOFFLER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT KOFFLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN BEN FORD, NICHOLAS STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koffler v. Ward et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
John Robert Koffler
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Warden Ben Ford, Nicholas Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koffler v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
John Robert Koffler
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Ben Ford, Nicholas Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CONNOR v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2021cv00113
Defendant:
SAMUEL ALITO, REDMOND BARNES, SCOTT HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
NYKA O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canning v. Carroll County Sheriff Dept.
as 3:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Carroll County Sheriff Dept., Terry Langley and Correct Health
Plaintiff:
John Robert Canning, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos Jr. v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv22301
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos Jr., Meletiez Edic, Peter Gabe and others
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. The U.S. et al
as 4:2020cv00104
Defendant:
Wash, D.C., The U.S.A. and The U.S.
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
