Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cooper v. Holcomb et al
as 2:2015cv00109
Petitioner:
Andrew Newton Cooper
Respondent:
Holcomb, Kim Thomas and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Monroe v. Byrne et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Douglas Monroe
Defendant:
Major Byrne, Capt. Bennett, Sgt. Means and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolding-Jones v. Kirby et al
as 5:2012cv03617
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyrone Bolding-Jones
Defendant:
Darlena Kirby, Susan Newton and Johnny Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Giles et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2010cv00779
Plaintiff:
Joshua E. Newton
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Nunley et al
as 1:2010cv00374
Plaintiff:
Roderick James Hicks
Defendant:
Donnie Nunley, Walter Myers, Norman Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama
as 7:2009cv01540
Petitioner:
Shaquinta Denise Newton
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Wheeler-White et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2009cv00595
Plaintiff:
Shaquinta Denise Newton
Defendant:
Cynthia S. Wheeler-White and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Carter et al
as 7:2009cv00928
Petitioner:
Shaquinta Denise Newton
Respondent:
Mary Carter and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Carter et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2009cv00353
Plaintiff:
Shaquinta Denise Newton
Defendant:
Mary Carter and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hicks v. Alexander City Community Base et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2007cv00726
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Alexander City Community Base and Glenn Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
