Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Clark v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and FNU George
Petitioner:
Ciaran Paul Redmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Woods v. Secretary, ADM et al
as 3:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Secretary, ADM, Ofc. Sgt. Bloom, Ofc. Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmond v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida (Orange County)
as 6:2023cv01245
Petitioner:
Edward Redmond
Defendant:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv03389
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Eddie Byrd and others
Respondent:
Brian Kemp, Jimmy S. Smith and Georgia Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'CONNOR v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2021cv00113
Defendant:
SAMUEL ALITO, REDMOND BARNES, SCOTT HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
NYKA O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDMOND v. JONES
as 3:2018cv01611
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Petitioner:
WILLIAM G REDMOND, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Redmond v. Brooks et al
as 1:2017cv02044
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Redmond
Defendant:
Brooks, Quality Correctional Care and Ron Smith
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Talladega County Jail
as 1:2017cv02040
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Redmond
Defendant:
Talladega County Jail, Talladega County Jail medical staff, Quality Correctional Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Morris v. Susan Redmond
as 13-10039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE HOEY MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN R. REDMOND
Redmond Bey v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv03004
Petitioner:
Phillip King Redmond Bey, III
Respondent:
State of Georgia and DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
