Cases 1 - 10 of 216
Holliday v. Oliphant et al
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Stephen Holliday
Defendant:
Warden Oliphant, Deputy Warden Stanley Williams and Sgt. Holliday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv01331
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Stanley Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Porter v. Illa et al
as 1:2019cv05423
Defendant:
Counselor James Jorges, Captain Gabriel Illa, Doctor Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Leo Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Illa et al
as 4:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Counselor James Jorges, Captain Gabriel Illa, Doctor Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Leo Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
WARDEN SECRETARY TENAKA BROWN, LISA FOUNTAIN, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. ALLEN et al
as 6:2019cv00011
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Defendant:
Marty Allen, Kearins, HYANNA BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
