Cases 1 - 10 of 28
NEGRIN v. GODBEE et al
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
ERIC MATTHEW NEGRIN
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR NATHANIAL GODBEE, SERGEANT EMMA HARVEY, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ERIC BENNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulgham v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Rodney Shane Fulgham
Defendant:
White, Mrs. Stuart, Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Brandon O'Neal King
Defendant:
Jackie L. Johnson, Jane Kennedy, Stuart Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Waycross Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv00060
Plaintiff:
Randall Wilson
Defendant:
Waycross Police Department, Dustin Crews and Stuart Deloach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Chatham County et al
as 4:2021cv00130
Defendant:
Stuart Glasby, Todd H. Martin, Adina C. Ripley and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fauntleroy v. Nugent
as 1:2020cv00779
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fauntleroy
Defendant:
Rachel Stuart and Kenneth S. Nugent, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shingleton v. Anderson et al
as 6:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Cpl. Perkins, Asst. DA Daffney Black, Atty Chief Council Steven Yekell and others
Plaintiff:
Isiah Shingleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manley v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00642
Petitioner:
Stuart Manley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Morman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv00410
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Robbie Stuart
Plaintiff:
Howard Dontel Morman and Hamond Dontel Morman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. McCloud et al
as 3:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Rodney McCloud, Sergeant Watts, Counselor Whitt and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Sanchez Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
