Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MICKLES v. ALABAMA SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
ALABAMA SUPREME COURT, MISSOURI, VIRGINIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickles v. Knight et al
as 8:2023cv01992
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Ross Knight, Joshua Knight, III, Sony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickles v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00245
Petitioner:
Terrell Mickles
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mickles v. Chase Credit Card et al
as 1:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Chase Credit Card, Visa Credit Card, American Express and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickles v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
United States of America, Bush Administration, Obama Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickles v. Democratic Republic Party of Africa et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Democratic Republic Party of Africa, Democratic Republic Party of Europe and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickles v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00344
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickles v. Bogota Columbia et al
as 1:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Bogota Columbia and World Bank Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickles v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00345
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickles v. Sentence Computation Center
as 1:2019cv00208
Respondent:
Sentence Computation Center
Petitioner:
Terrell Mickles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
