Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 651
MURZIKE v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff: JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant: C T HUGHES, K PERKINS, S SPEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant: J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant: WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01795
Petitioner: Michael Renaldo Turner
Respondent: Timothy Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner, Mason v. Monroe County Sheriff
as 4:2024cv10035
Plaintiff: Mason C. Turner
Defendant: Monroe County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner, Mason v. Palm Beach County Sheriff
as 9:2024cv80502
Plaintiff: Mason C. Turner
Defendant: Palm Beach County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
DAVIS v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff: DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS and CHRISTOPHER HORTEN
Defendant: R QUINN, C HORTEN, K EMMIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Moore v. Martin et al
as 5:2024cv00255
Plaintiff: Jason Everett Moore
Defendant: Mark Martin, Edward Lewter, Kevin Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?