Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Mickles v. Knight et al
as 8:2023cv01992
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Ross Knight, Joshua Knight, III, Sony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Justice Department et al
as 5:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Justice Department, United States District Courts, Supreme Courts of United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Grogan v. USA, et al
as 22-13384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH GROGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Grogan v. United States Government
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grogan
Defendant:
United States Government, Treasury Department, IRS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gay v. The State of GA et al
as 1:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Sammy Levi Gay
Defendant:
The State of GA, The State of VA, The White House Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Tate v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2010cv00257
Plaintiff:
Marcus Tate
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Roman Pope, Queen of England and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHES v 700 BILLION BAILOUT PLAN, et al
as 1:2008cv00224
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, RAYMOND LAMB and CHARLES KEATING
Defendant:
SENATE BANKING COMMITTEE, ALI VELSHI, HENRY PAULSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
