Cases 1 - 10 of 1,546
Casey v. Terry et al
as 3:2024cv01260
Defendant:
NAPH Care, David Terry, Thomas Freese and others
Plaintiff:
Quintus Bernard Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Blackwood
as 1:2024cv00242
Defendant:
Keith Blackwood
Plaintiff:
Willie Kevin Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Marshal et al
as 1:2024cv00929
Defendant:
Stacey Lopez, Steve Lopez, Steven T. Marshal and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jones
as 3:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Ometris Williams
Defendant:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacoby v. Harris (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00548
Defendant:
T. Harris
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Jackson et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00538
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail Administration, Officer Bates, Officer Sweeny and others
Plaintiff:
George Harvey Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00546
Defendant:
Officer Bates, Officer Sweeny, Sgt. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keenan Lanier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Charles Thompson, Chadwick Crabtree, John Doe Correctional Officer 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shedd v. Streeter et al
as 5:2024cv01127
Respondent:
Warden Streeter and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Petitioner:
James William Shedd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Williams et al
as 6:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Donnie Lee Bailey
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Burt, Rache Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
