Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Armstrong v. City of Woodstock, Georgia
as 1:2021cv03646
Plaintiff:
Alex Armstrong
Defendant:
City of Woodstock, Georgia
v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2020cv00709
Defendant:
Denise Armstrong and Padgett Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Armstrong v. Padgett Security, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00710
Defendant:
Padgett Security, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denise Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Armstrong v. United States of America et al
as 7:2020cv00796
Plaintiff:
Reshawn Armstrong
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Appelbaum et al v. Food Giant Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00772
Defendant:
Mitchell Retail Properties LLC, Pinson Valley Properties LLC, Mitchell Grocery Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Marsue Lancaster, John Whitaker, Lenore F Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Armstrong et al v. H2OCEAN, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv14175
Defendant:
Edward Kolos, H2Ocean, Inc. and H2OCEAN, LLC
Plaintiff:
Anthony Siderio and Michael Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Lasseter v. Restaurant Delivery Developers, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv01912
Plaintiff:
Jerry Trump, Catherine Garner, Jillian Price and others
Defendant:
Daniel Sinor, Thomas Colangelo, Restaurant Delivery Developers, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Craig Bankston v. Sewon America, Inc., et al
as 18-11470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG BANKSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
SEWON AMERICA, INC. and CHRIS ARMSTRONG
Appelbaum et al v. Conagra Brands Inc
as 2:2018cv00375
Plaintiff:
Stuart Appelbaum , Lenore F Miller , Jack Wurm, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Conagra Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Armstrong v. No Pressure Roof Cleaning LLC et al
as 9:2017cv81356
Plaintiff:
Ryan Armstrong
Defendant:
No Pressure Roof Cleaning LLC and Paul Guitard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
