Labor Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 70
BILES v. CITY OF JACKSON
as 5:2017cv00281
Plaintiff: COREY BILES
Defendant: CITY OF JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Isom et al v. Diner 24, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01693
Plaintiff: Keisha Isom and Corey Gaines
Defendant: Diner 24, Inc., Melissa M. Collado and Kenneth Collado
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Jordan v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 0:2017cv61375
Plaintiff: Corey Jordan
Defendant: Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Woods v. H.E.H. Paving, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01758
Defendant: H.E.H. Paving, Inc., Hobson Milner, Tarik Milner and others
Plaintiff: Corey Woods
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Johnson et al v. JT Ruby Contracting, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00677
Plaintiff: Kendrick Johnson and Corey Ivey
Defendant: JT Ruby Contracting, Inc. and Joseph Ruby
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carter et al v. Cadence Bancorp LLC
as 2:2016cv00712
Plaintiff: Blake Edward Carter and Corey Christopher Jones
Defendant: Cadence Bancorp LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smitherman v. Chow Lao Liew LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01950
Plaintiff: Corey Smitherman
Defendant: Chow Lao Liew LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dyer et al v. M&M Asphalt Maintenance Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv01512
Plaintiff: Kenneth A. Dyer, Jr. , Michael A. Hill , Robert P. Anderson and others
Defendant: M&M Asphalt Maintenance Inc., All County Paving, Inc., Jeffrey Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Campbell v. HMGT, LLC
as 3:2015cv00657
Plaintiff: Corey Campbell
Defendant: HMGT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Desimoni et al v. TBC Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00366
Plaintiff: Corey Desimoni and James Reiter
Defendant: TBC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?