Cases 41 - 50 of 470
Jones v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv20704
Plaintiff:
Terry Jones
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jones v. Kysor Warren
as 1:2022cv01679
Plaintiff:
Rob Jones
Defendant:
Kysor Warren
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jones v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
as 9:2022cv80241
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Waste Pro USA, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Waste Pro USA, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michael L Jones and Michael L. Jones
Defendant:
Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Michael Jones v. EVRAZ Inc. North America, et al
as 21-13808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
EVRAZ INC. NORTH AMERICA, PENSION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF EVRAZ INC., N.A., EVRAZ INC., N.A. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE and others
Jones et al v. ASK Telemarketing, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Natasha Jones, Jonessa Jones, JaKaya Sanders and others
Defendant:
ASK Telemarketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones-Young v. Southern Crescent Behavioral Health System
as 1:2021cv05030
Plaintiff:
Precious Jones-Young
Defendant:
Southern Crescent Behavioral Health System doing business as Anchor Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Britus v. Braden River Rehabilitation Center, LLC
as 8:2021cv02703
Plaintiff:
Jones Britus
Defendant:
Braden River Rehabilitation Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jones v. Shaw Development, LLC
as 2:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND JONES
Defendant:
Shaw Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
