Cases 91 - 100 of 3,647
Davis v. Headley et al
as 5:2023cv01251
Petitioner:
Undral Sandor Davis
Respondent:
Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew PhillipsIn re: Matthew Phillips
as 23-13080
Petitioner:
In re: MATTHEW SHERMAN PHILLIPS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Donald v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
John Riley Donald
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Parole and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. D.O.C. State of Alabama
as 2:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Ernest Rogers
Defendant:
D.O.C. State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Headley et al
as 1:2023cv01218
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Joseph H Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oscar AvilezIn re: Oscar Avilez
as 23-12997
Petitioner:
In re: OSCAR AVILEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Jackson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 6:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Jackson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, State of Alabama and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Donald Dzsan Lockett and Donald D'zsan Lockett
Respondent:
Karen Williams and State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
