Cases 91 - 100 of 103
Batson v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Quentin Lee Batson
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Habersham County Sheriff's Department and Habersham County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Cobb County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Allen Scott
Defendant:
Cobb County Sheriff's Department and Rich Bozich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Rome Judicial Circuit and Floyd County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roper v. Hall County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
Oscar Leshan Roper
Defendant:
Hall County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roper v. Gill
as 2:2013cv00270
Plaintiff:
Oscar Leshan Roper
Defendant:
Gill and Hall County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Lavender et al
as 3:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Ward
Defendant:
Robert W. Lavender, Kevin Nolley, Jimmy LeCroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swanagan v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv03149
Plaintiff:
Leonard G. Swanagan
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Cobb County Adult Detention Center , Cobb County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Stevens v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
Daquan Lamont Stevens
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Paul Howard, Jr., Gabe Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2013cv03313
Plaintiff:
Daquan Lamont Stevens
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Paul Howard, Jr., Gabe Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Barrow County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Latwon Dukes
Defendant:
Barrow County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
