Cases 101 - 110 of 141
United States of America v. Firearms
as 2:2011cv03723
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Firearms
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
USA v. TWELVE (12) ASSORTED FIREARMS
as 4:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
TWELVE (12) ASSORTED FIREARMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Frank v. Equip 2 Conceal Firearms Group LLC et al
as 8:2011cv01940
Plaintiff:
Katherine Frank
Defendant:
Equip 2 Conceal Firearms Group LLC and Robert Shewmake
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America, The v. Firearms
as 5:2011cv02828
Plaintiff:
United States of America, The
Defendant:
Firearms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Marshall v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 1:2011cv21247
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Marshall
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
United States of America v. Twenty-Nine Firearms
as 5:2010cv00640
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Twenty-Nine Firearms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Mercutio Stokes, et al v. Richie Zayas, et al
as 10-15366
Movant - Appellant:
MERCUTIO STOKES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHIE ZAYAS, Agent for the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and UNKNOWN AGENT, U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Diamondback Firearms, LLC v. Saeilo, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv01664
Plaintiff:
Diamondback Firearms, LLC
Defendant:
Saeilo, Inc. and Kook Jin Moon
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EIGHTY-FOUR FIREARMS
as 5:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EIGHTY-FOUR FIREARMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
United States of America v. $13,310 In United States Currency et al
as 1:2010cv02773
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$13,310 In United States Currency and Three Firearms
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
