Cases 111 - 119 of 119
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2010cv01877
Petitioner:
James Davis, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. David Harrell
as 10-10505
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID HARRELL, a.k.a. Bruce Davis, a.k.a. David Smith, a.k.a. Darren Johnson, a.k.a. Bruce Kelley, a.k.a. Bruce Smith, a.k.a. Lil' Dave, a.k.a. Robbin Hood, a.k.a. David Johnson, a.k.a. James Davis
Davis v. Conagra Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc., Giant Food Inc., Giant Food Inc. and others
Carpentier v. Davis et al
as 3:2009cv01241
Plaintiff:
Keith Richard Carpentier
Defendant:
James Davis, Derek P. Gibstien, Michael Wiggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Other Statutes
Buccini v. Schlossberg et al
as 1:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Karolina Kennedy Buccini
Defendant:
Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, Edwin Schlossberg, Rose Schlossberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buccini v. Schlossberg et al
as 1:2009mi00134
Plaintiff:
Karolina Kennedy Buccini
Defendant:
Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, Edwin Schlossberg, Rose Schlossberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. ConAgra Foods Inc
as 1:2008cv01475
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Conagra Foods Inc and Conagra Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Kimble v. Moore et al
as 0:2007cv60118
Plaintiff:
Clarence Kimble
Defendant:
Mathis Darnell Moore, Willie James Davis and Michael D. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
