Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 141 - 149 of 149
Shaw et al v. The Birmingham Board of Eduation et al
as 2:2008cv01104
Plaintiff: Larry Shaw, Anthony Gary, Walter Cook and others
Defendant: The Birmingham Board of Eduation and Arthur Watts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Shaw v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 4:2008cv00150
Plaintiff: Phillip Randy Shaw
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shaw v. The City of Dothan, Alabama et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00621
Defendant: The City of Dothan, Alabama(INMATE1)
Plaintiff: Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Marshall et al (INMATE1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00606
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Shaw
Defendant: D. T. Marshall, Art Baylor, C. J. Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettway v. Tinwood Ventures et al
as 2:2007cv00423
Plaintiff: Loretta Pettway
Defendant: Tinwood Ventures, William Arnett, Paul Arnett and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00838
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shaw v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv00718
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Shaw
Defendant: Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Morgan et al v. Shaw et al
as 3:2007cv00276
Plaintiff: Jerry Morgan and Emma Morgan
Defendant: Stanley Shaw, Stanley Shaw and Gordon Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Shaw v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00215
Plaintiff: Patricia P. Shaw
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?