Cases 151 - 160 of 213
Lowe v. Home Town Bank of Alabama
as 2:2011cv02101
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lowe
Defendant:
Home Town Bank of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1971
Estate of Phillip C. McMullins, The v. Sparks et al
as 4:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Estate of Phillip C. McMullins, The
Defendant:
Neal Sparks , Chris West and Crossville, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Town of Lexington, Alabama et al
as 3:2011cv01106
Plaintiff:
Jerry Morris
Defendant:
Town of Lexington, Alabama , Town of Anderson, Alabama , Mark Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard et al v. Oakman, Town of et al
as 6:2011cv00494
Plaintiff:
Hubert E Woodard, Jr , Jack Smith and Ronnie Phillips
Defendant:
Oakman, Town of , Leon Welch , Joyce Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Sparks et al
as 4:2011mc00331
Plaintiff:
Debra Hood
Defendant:
Neal Sparks, Crossville, Town of and Collinsville, City of
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Carbon Hill, Town of, AL et al
as 6:2010cv03415
Plaintiff:
Calvin S Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Carbon Hill, Town of, AL , Thomas Sorrell and Bob King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bethel et al v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2010cv00654
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
Barbara Muhammad, City of Mobile, Regina Cason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Greenville et al v. BP, PLC et al
as 2:2010cv00756
Plaintiff:
City of Greenville , City of Evergreen , City of Georgiana and others
Defendant:
BP, PLC, BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
