Cases 161 - 170 of 90,602
Hardy v. Barnes
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Hardy
Defendant:
Lee Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raley v. Pitts et al
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Raley
Defendant:
Jonathan Pitts, Clay Conway, Mike Cheshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 120711 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kelly v. Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Gregory Kelly
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services doing business as Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Service ("ADRS"), Charles Wilkinson, Kevin Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Adams v. Doughmnan et al
as 2:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Sharon Diana Adams
Defendant:
Joseph Cooper Doughmnan and Geico Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Burnett et al v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Audrey Burnett and Tarek Ellison
Defendant:
Carl Denzel Jenkins and JMC Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Scott v. Sirius XM Radio Inc
as 5:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Micah Scott
Defendant:
Sirius XM Radio Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
