Cases 11 - 20 of 32,526
TINEO v. INTERNATIONAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FUND, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv22423
Plaintiff:
ADELAI JOSE TINEO
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FUND, LLC, WILLIAM J. MOURNES, MARK ZOUVAZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
United Exports Sales and Marketing, LLC v. Fresh Results, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv61097
Plaintiff:
United Exports Sales and Marketing, LLC
Defendant:
Fresh Results, LLC, Eric R. Crawford and Douglas J. Ranno
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Hill v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Patrice Van Hill
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Evans, Roger v. Holtz et al
as 9:2024cv80773
Plaintiff:
Roger Von Evans
Defendant:
J. Holtz, D. Hawley and T. Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SOLOMON v. BRAHAM et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARNELL SOLOMON
Defendant:
BRAHAM and J FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01515
Plaintiff:
April Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Raymond Ramirez v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-12062
Petitioner:
RAYMOND J. RAMIREZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Alfredo Bless v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 24-12061
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO BLESS
Defendant:
RICKY D. DIXON, J. LOVE, FRANCE/FRANTZ and others
MELENDEZ v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Angelea J Melendez
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alfred v. Bernstein et al
as 1:2024cv22395
Plaintiff:
Jerry Neil Alfred
Defendant:
Daniel J. Bernstein, Scott D. Egleston and Brian J. McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
