Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Matthew James Choy v. United States Southern District of Florida, et al
as 22-10273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES CHOY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, BOP, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
QUILL v. STRONG et al
as 4:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
SOPHIA J QUILL
Respondent:
STRONG, FED BOP, FCI TALLAHASSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Houston v. Padlps et al
as 1:2021cv03599
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
S. W. Padlps, Lt. O., Lt. N. Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FIORITO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv03152
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. FIORITO
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Carvajal, IAN CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Choy v. United States Southern District of Florida et al
as 1:2021cv22072
Defendant:
Karen Gilbert, BOP, Seth Powers and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Choy
Parks v. Attorney General Trump Admin et al
as 5:2021cv00235
Defendant:
A.W. Graphton, FNU Lee, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David S.L. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLEMING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2020cv00545
Plaintiff:
RHONDA FLEMING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN OFFICER, WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALFORD v. FCI MARIANNA FLORIDA et al
as 5:2020cv00305
Defendant:
BOP and FCI MARIANNA FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. Commissioner of Georgia Dept of Corr. et al
as 6:2020cv00106
Respondent:
Warden Trevonzo Bobbitt, U.S. Government, U.S. Marshals and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parks v. Cheatham et al
as 5:2019cv00648
Defendant:
FNU Brown, R.C. Cheatham, Dr. Mark Tidwell and others
Plaintiff:
David S.L. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
