Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Casper v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv23521
Plaintiff:
Craven Casper
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Clerk of Court, United States District Court District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
CASPER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06519
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CASPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Caspers v. Chattem, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv17726
Plaintiff:
Michael Caspers
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
Casper v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv16441
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Casper
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
ROEDL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24776
Plaintiff:
JAMES CASPER ROEDL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASPER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22019
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. CASPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASPER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20952
Plaintiff:
JAMES CASPER and JAMES M CASPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08568
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CASPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps v. Sapp et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Lt. Sapp, Sgt. or Off. Pittman, Sgt. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
