Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coakley v. The City of Hollywood et al
as 0:2022cv61537
Plaintiff:
LeCharles Rashad Coakley
Defendant:
The City of Hollywood, Ervin Chunga, Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv03080
Plaintiff:
Julia M Robinson
Defendant:
The City of Hollywood Police Department, The City of Hollywood Florida, Choice Hotels International Services Corp. Service Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Melton v. City of Hollywood
as 0:2022cv60788
Plaintiff:
Jalisa Melton
Defendant:
City of Hollywood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv62380
Plaintiff:
Hollywood Police Officers Retirement System and City of Hollywood Police Officers Retirement System
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., David J. Henshall, Robert M Calderoni and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv60313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
