Cases 11 - 20 of 166
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reaves v. National Law Enforcement et al
as 1:2023cv02836
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
National Law Enforcement, Bill Phillips, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephanie MaddoxIn re: Stephanie Maddox
as 23-12027
Petitioner:
In re: STEPHANIE MADDOX
Respondent:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY, GEORGIA
CHANDLER v. STRAUDER et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
JAKALE ERRION CHANDLER
Defendant:
STRAUDER, DEPUTY WARDEN POWELL and CLARKE COUNTY ATHENS GA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSH v. DOE et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAMAR MARSH
Defendant:
JANE DOE and CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Knowlton et al
as 1:2022cv04765
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
Carl Knowlton, Michael Cody Guined, Wendy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TUCKER v. WOODS et al
as 3:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
KENNETH O'NEAL TUCKER
Defendant:
MAJOR WOODS, SGT APRIL SLAY and ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Emrit v. Fort Lauderdale Police Department, et al
as 22-13836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT and CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
