Cases 11 - 20 of 24
GILLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52865
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GILLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34844
Plaintiff:
SWEN GILLEN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv23788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bullard et al v. Nationstar Mortgage Corporation et al
as 9:2017cv80284
Plaintiff:
John Bullard, Eddie Whitehead and Randal A. Ferguson
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage Corporation, Adam Scwartz, Law Firm of Akerman LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rucker v. Martin County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2016cv14344
Plaintiff:
Robert John Rucker
Defendant:
Martin County Sheriff Department, Leonard DeBellis, State Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Micron Devices, LLC v. Gillen
as 0:2015cv62274
Plaintiff:
Micron Devices, LLC
Defendant:
Carley Gillen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C.R.N.H. v. Nebus et al
as 9:2015cv80480
Plaintiff:
C.R.N.H.
Defendant:
Dennis Nebus , Jeffrey Gillen and Sheriff of Palm Beach County Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
