Cases 11 - 20 of 158
GRIBBEN v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2010cv00320
Plaintiff:
PAUL GRIBBEN
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vrain Scott v. DOC State of Florida, et al
as 10-11873
Petitioner - Appellant:
VRAIN SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA, James McDonough, Secretary and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA
Cole v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cole
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, James McDonough, Walter McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Le et al
as 2:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Bryan Le, S. E. Young, S. Cerdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TILLMAN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2009cv00423
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES MCDONOUGH, RONNIE HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY TILLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gunn v. McDonough et al
as 3:2008cv01033
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lanard Gunn, Jr.
Defendant:
James McDonough, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eaglin v. Polk et al
as 3:2008cv00880
Plaintiff:
Dwight Thomas Eaglin
Defendant:
Randall Polk, Danny Hopkins, Abraham Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. David et al
as 0:2008cv61274
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Jones
Defendant:
Monica David, Tena M. Pate, Frederick B. Dunphy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAKER v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2008cv00277
Plaintiff:
ROLLIE L BAKER
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01124
Plaintiff:
Theodore Bowers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., Secretary, Department of Corrections, James Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
