Cases 11 - 20 of 34
In re: Joseph Dingler
as 17-14393
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH DINGLER
Mandamus Respondent:
JAMES N. HATTEN, U.S. Dustrict Court, Clerk, JUSTIN S. ANAND, U.S. District Court, AMY TOTENBERG, U.S. District Court and others
Dingler et al v. Hatten et al
as 1:2017cv03632
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler and Ashton Dingler
Defendant:
James N. Hatten, Justin S. Anand, Amy Totenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bergeron v. Unknown Public Defender of Cherokee County Number One (1) et al
as 1:2017cv01948
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Unknown Public Defender of Cherokee County Number One (1), Unknown Public Defender of Cherokee County Number Two (2), Unknown Public Defender of Cherokee County Number Three (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowrey El Bey et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv03787
Plaintiff:
Anthony Blake Lowrey El Bey and Anthony Blake Lowrey Estate Trust
Defendant:
United States of America, United States District Court, Atlanta Division, Thomas W. Thrash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Diaz v. Hatten
as 1:2016cv01447
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Miranda Diaz
Defendant:
James N. Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimbush v. May et al
as 1:2016cv00818
Plaintiff:
Therian Wimbush
Defendant:
Leigh Martin May, Russell G. Vineyard and James N. Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00696
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00695
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
