Cases 11 - 20 of 39
In re: Larry Barber
as 19-13226
Not Yet Classified:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY JAMES BARBER
HALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03076
Plaintiff:
NATHAN THOMAS, TONY CAMPBELL, JAMES HARTSON and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larry Barber v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 19-11703
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY JAMES BARBER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Longmire v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Carla Longmire
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama , Sandy S. Stimpson , James Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City Of Mobile et al
as 1:2015cv00580
Plaintiff:
Frederick Van Allen Smith
Defendant:
City Of Mobile , Sandy Stimpson and James Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Barber v. Everglades CI Warden, et al
as 15-10648
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY JAMES BARBER
Respondent - Appellee:
EVERGLADES CI WARDEN, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Barber v. Mayo et al
as 1:2014cv21274
Plaintiff:
Larry James Barber
Defendant:
Larry Mayo , Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Larry Barber v. Steven Vershel
as 13-13412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY JAMES BARBER
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN M. VERSHEL, Trooper FHP, ANGELA BOTERO and PATRICIA NANZ, a.k.a. Patricia Noni
Barber v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv21882
Plaintiff:
Larry James Barber
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
