Cases 11 - 20 of 27
KING v. CROSBY
as 3:2010cv00258
Petitioner:
LAMONT CLIFFORD KING
Respondent:
JAMES CROSBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. CROSBY
as 4:2010cv00300
Plaintiff:
LAMONT CLIFFORD KING
Defendant:
JAMES CROSBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlie Robinson v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-11389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Walter McNeil, JAMES CROSBY, Former, Secretary Department of Corrections, ORLESTER DICKENS, Secretary's Representative and others
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2010cv00323
Plaintiff:
Charlie Robinson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, James Crosby, Orlester Dickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUNNELL v. CROSBY et al
as 4:2008cv00533
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY R. TUNNELL
Defendant:
JAMES CROSBY, MARK KAPLAN and JEB BUSH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Margiotti v. Crosby
as 1:2008cv21673
Plaintiff:
Vincent Margiotti
Defendant:
James Crosby, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowers v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01124
Plaintiff:
Theodore Bowers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., Secretary, Department of Corrections, James Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McGill v. Crosby et al
as 2:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
John McGill
Defendant:
James Crosby, Dr. Smith, R. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McGill v. Crosby et al
as 1:2007cv23171
Plaintiff:
John McGill
Defendant:
James Crosby, Smith, R. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
