Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Lovelace v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv03112
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Lovelace, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Hill, CorrectHealth Care Medical Provider, Clayton Co. Private Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHRISTENSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17591
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK CHRISTENSEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCLELLAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12946
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK MCCLELLAN and MICHAEL P MCCLELLAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duster et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Duster, Gary Michael Cummings, John Page Cunningham and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals AMericas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
HAYES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03345
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK HAYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Rayford, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HADLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18693
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK HADLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HALL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14483
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK HALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14876
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK WARREN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
