Cases 11 - 20 of 32
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv47292
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Crickmar et al
as 4:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Crickmar, Dueberry, Alisa Hammock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith et al
as 5:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
Corey Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Brian K. Smith, Edina Johnson and Department of Corrections, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Smith v. Scott Israel, et al
as 14-13558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL NATHANIEL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT ISRAEL, Broward County Sheriff's Office, J. OWENS, Sergeant #4292, Broward County - Main Jail, J. LARA, Detention Deputy #9139, Broward County - Main Jail and others
Smith v. Israel et al
as 0:2014cv61139
Plaintiff:
Darryl Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Scott Israel, J. Owens, J. Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Smith v. Alto Daniels
as 14-10992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER NATHANIEL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALTO DANIELS, Correctional Officer
Walter Smith v. Alto Daniel
as 12-14237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER NATHANIEL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALTO DANIELS, Correctional Officer
CITIZENS BANK v. ACS/NES PROPERTIES INC et al
as 7:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS BANK
Defendant:
ACS/NES PROPERTIES INC, ADONNA SMITH and NATHANIEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2011cv04082
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lester Jackson, Chatham County Superior Court, Richmond County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
