Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017mc80962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al v. Paschal et al
as 4:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Devin Ross Paschal, David Scott, FAF, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Hill-Rom Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
David Scott
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Company, Inc. and Devin Ross Paschal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
He v. Rom
as 0:2016mc60273
Plaintiff:
Rui He
Defendant:
Davor Rom
Petitioner:
Iryna Ivashchuk
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv21066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Henry McCone v. City of Orlando, et al
as 11-14103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY MCCONE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Florida, SCOTT ZOLLARS, individually and in their official capacities, CB RICHARD ELLIS, INC. and others
McCone v. City of Orlando et al
as 6:2011cv01047
Plaintiff:
Henry McCone
Defendant:
City of Orlando, Scott Zollars, CB Richard Ellis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Doyle v. Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Gregory Christopher Doyle
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Company, Inc. and Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
