Cases 11 - 20 of 139
Leahy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee County)
as 8:2023cv02041
Petitioner:
Rachael Natalie Leahy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
LEAHY v. BUSCHER
as 4:2023cv00397
Petitioner:
Rachael Leahy and RACHAEL NATALIE LEAHY
Respondent:
Jerry Buscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Rachael Winslow
as 23-12230
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RACHAEL MAIA WINSLOW, a.k.a. Pamela Henderson
Zevecke v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02717
Plaintiff:
Rachael Zevecke
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARPENTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14705
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL L CARPENTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TRUEBLOOD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13873
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL TRUEBLOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Singh v. Savor Lounge, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv21715
Plaintiff:
Gabriella Singh
Defendant:
Savor Lounge, LLC, Dozie Udemadu, Kathiana Francois-Udemadu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Copeland v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03675
Plaintiff:
Rachael Copeland
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
